| Robotic Pharmacists - Drug Dispensing Made Easy
Pharmacists have a tough job, aside from reading illegible prescriptions, and ensuring that only the right pharmaceutical drugs are dispensed, they have to constantly run colse to stockrooms seeing for drugs. However, some pharmacies may have already found a clarification in the form of robotic pharmacists. |
|
Recently, a new set of robotic dispensers, christened as "robodispensers," were introduced at Leicester's hospitals' pharmacies. These robots are big machines, about eight meters in size, and are high-priced too, with each piece costing about Us$ 463,530. The New Age Dispensers The new age pharmacists seem to be clever and productive machines, as they can tirelessly work round the clock and not need even a cat's nap. They can accurately uncover and dispense 700 medicines a day - 60 per hour, in increasing to storing 25,000 packs of medicines. When a pharmacy technician asks the robots to fetch a pack of a singular pharmaceutical - patent or a generic drug, the on-board computer swings into action, calculating where the medicines are stocked. Next, the picking head gets to right spot, and using a suction arm pulls the pack from the shelf. After which the pack find its way onto a conveyor belt and the drugs are delivered to the technician. Bulky and pricey they may be, however they have a estimate of advantages over human pharmacists. For instance, they can save many pharmacists the pain of rushing about stockrooms in hunt of medicines, and they can better focus on ensuring that the right medicines are dispensed. Also, these robotic dispensers are highly spoton because rely on the barcodes on the prescription drugs packs to identify medicines, thus reducing errors. And, a reduced turn colse to time is yet someone else benefit. Perhaps, reduced costs and overall installations of such machines will take care of the woes of pharmacy technicians colse to the world. Robotic Pharmacists - Drug Dispensing Made Easy |
Friday, December 23, 2011
Robotic Pharmacists - Drug Dispensing Made Easy
Thursday, December 22, 2011
What Kind of Camera Should My Wedding Photographer Use?
If you are in the process of looking for a wedding photographer, chances are you will soon hear the terms: medium format, 35mm, and digital. Those are the three primary types of camera systems currently used by wedding photographers. We, the wedding photographers, have argued among ourselves for years as to which camera principles is best. I'll start by sharing with you about the distinct camera systems and will then give you my conception of which camera principles your wedding photographer should use. |
|
Medium Format For many years medium format has been the absolute best option. A medium format camera uses film that is 3 times the size of a 35mm negative-- resulting in higher resolution images and beautiful enlargements, however, the cameras and processing costs are very expensive. Primary advantages: high resolution negatives. Previously, the fact that a someone owned a Medium Format camera was almost, in and of itself, a sign that they were a true "wedding photographer" (due to the price of the system). Disadvantages: high-priced to control (film costs are so high that some wedding photography books encourage medium format photographers to limit the photos they take); film can be lost or damaged during processing; slower to focus and operate. 35mm For many years 35mm has had a bad credit for providing poor quality enlargements -- especially when compared to medium format. However, over the past 10 years the quality of 35mm film has improved tremendously. It is now a tasteless format used by many professional photographers, especially those who use the photojournalistic style and shoot close to a thousand or more images on a wedding day. Primary advantages to 35mm: fast (easy to quickly focus and shoot during), much improved quality of enlargements (many people would have a hard time telling the incompatibility between a 35mm and medium format 8x10 enlargement). Disadvantages: processing film is becoming more and more expensive, and film can be damaged or loss during processing. Many photographers that shoot film are now having the negatives scanned so that the files become a digital file. Digital Professional digital wedding photography has been a viable choice since about the year 2000 (although some would argue that date). The quality of digital cameras has now reached a point where I now feel digital has surpassed the quality of medium format negatives. Keep in mind there is a broad variety of cameras, and a "professional" digital camera from 2004 that cost ,500 new will not capture the quality of images that a "pro-am" (a camera targeted to advanced amateurs and also professionals) from 2010 that costs ,000 will capture. "Digital camera" covers a heavy spectrum of cameras and camera quality. Primary digital advantages: instant retell of images on the back of the camera; no film and processing costs (although the savings is offset by the supplementary computer time required to process the digital images); more control over the images (i.e., a wee rotation or cropping of an image is quick and easy with digital but requires a convention print from 35mm or medium format). Many digital cameras surpass the quality of even medium format. Disadvantages: technology changes rapidly over time and cameras soon are outdated (although this doesn't necessarily follow you, as the consumer). Memory cards are easier to lose than rolls of film (if your wedding photographer uses a digital camera, ask them how they make sure the photos arrive safely back at the studio). So, which camera principles should my photographer use? No matter what you have been told - all three formats are a viable formula for wedding photography. Some might be more high-priced than others, but they all Can furnish good results. The fact is that all three systems can follow in poor-quality photos, too. Many photographers use any of the camera systems. Some might use medium format for the formals but 35mm for the reception and ceremony coverage. Others will primarily shoot digital, but might bring film cameras as backup equipment. This is the key: before signing a contract with a photographer, ask to see sample enlargements that were taken with the same equipment that would be used at your wedding. If you like the quality and color of the images, it doesn't indeed matter whether 35mm, digital, or a medium format camera was used to article the image! |